Email us | 0161 886 8000

Corporate Governance

Principles of Corporate Governance

The Group’s Board appreciates the value of good corporate governance not only in the areas of accountability and risk management but also as a positive contribution to business prosperity. It believes that corporate governance involves more than a simple “box ticking” approach to establish whether a Company has met the principles (including those set out in the QCA’s Corporate Governance Code for Small and Mid-Size Quoted Companies 2013) of a number of specific rules and regulations. Rather the issue is one of applying corporate governance in a sensible and pragmatic fashion having regard to the individual circumstances of a particular company’s business. The key objective is to enhance and protect shareholder value.

Board Structure

The Board is responsible to shareholders for the proper management of the Group.

The non-executive directors have a particular responsibility to ensure that the strategies proposed by the executive directors are fully considered.

To enable the Board to discharge its duties, all directors have full and timely access to all relevant information and there is a procedure for all directors, in furtherance of their duties, to take independent professional advice, if necessary, at the expense of the Group. The Board has a formal schedule of matters reserved to it and meets monthly. It is responsible for overall group strategy, approval of major capital expenditure projects and consideration of significant financing matters.

The following committees have been set up, which have written terms of reference and deal with specific aspects of the Group’s affairs.

  1. The Remuneration Committee is responsible for making recommendations to the Board on the Group’s framework of executive remuneration and its cost. The committee determines the contract terms, remuneration and other benefits for each of the executive directors, including pension rights and compensation payments. The Board itself determines the remuneration of the non-executive director. The committee meets at least twice a year.
  1. The Audit Committee includes the executive and non-executive directors. Its prime tasks are to review the scope of the external audit, to receive regular reports from Baker Tilly UK Audit LLP, and to review the half-yearly and annual accounts before they are presented to the Board, focusing in particular on accounting policies and areas of management judgment and estimation. The committee is responsible for monitoring the controls which are in force to ensure the integrity of the information reported to the shareholders. The committee acts as a forum for discussion of internal control issues and contributes to the Board’s review of the effectiveness of the Group’s internal control and risk management systems and processes. It advises the Board on the appointment of external auditors and on their remuneration for both audit and non-audit work, and discusses the nature and scope of the audit with the external auditors. It reviews and monitors the independence of the auditors especially with regard to non-audit work. It meets at least twice a year including immediately before the submission of the annual and interim financial statements to the Board.

On the 24 February 2014, the Company appointed Greg McMahon as a Non-Executive Director. Greg has joined both the remuneration committee and the audit committee Greg was appointed as a Non-Executive Director based on his experience as a Legal Counsel for quoted companies.

No formal nomination committee exists in view of the stage of development of the Group. Instead appointments to the Board by the Chief Executive and other executive directors are discussed with the Non-Executive Chairman. Appointments are made after an evaluation of the skills, knowledge and expertise required to ensure that the Board as a whole has the ability to ensure that the Group can continue to compete effectively in its market place.

Internal control

The directors are responsible for the Group’s system of internal control and for reviewing its effectiveness. The Board has designed the Group’s system of internal control in order to provide the directors with reasonable assurance that its assets are safeguarded, that transactions are authorised and properly recorded and that material errors and irregularities are either prevented or would be detected within a timely period. However, no system of internal control can eliminate the risk of failure to achieve business objectives or provide absolute assurance against material misstatement or loss.   The key elements of the control system in operation are:

  1. The Board meets regularly with a formal schedule of matters reserved to it for decision and has put in place an organisational structure with clear lines of responsibility defined and with appropriate delegation of authority;
  2. There are procedures for planning, approval and monitoring of capital expenditure and information systems for monitoring the Group’s financial performance against approved budgets and forecasts.

The process adopted by the Group accords with the guidance contained in the document ’Corporate Governance Code for Small and Mid-Size Quoted Companies 2013.

The Audit Committee receives reports from the external auditors on a regular basis and from the executive directors of the Group. During the period, the Board has reviewed the effectiveness of the system of internal control as described above. The Board has considered whether the Group’s internal controls processes would be significantly enhanced by an internal audit function and has taken the view that at the Group’s current stage of development, this is not required. The Board will continue to review this matter each year. The Board receives periodic reports from all committees.

There are no significant issues disclosed in the financial statements for the period ended 31 December 2014 and up to the date of approval of the report and financial statements that have required the Board to deal with any related material internal control issues.

Relations with shareholders

The Group values its dialogue with both institutional and private investors. Effective two-way communication with fund managers, institutional investors and analysts is actively pursued and this encompasses issues such as performance, policy and strategy. During the period the directors have had meetings with analysts and institutions and will continue to do so.

There is also an opportunity, at the Company’s Annual General Meeting for individual shareholders to raise general business matters with the full Board and notice of the Company’s Annual General Meeting is circulated to all shareholders at least 20 working days before such meeting. The Chairman of both the Audit Committee and the Remuneration Committee will be available at the Annual General Meeting to answer questions.


City Code on Takeovers and Mergers

Frenkel Topping Group PLC is subject to the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers.